Apr 24 2010

Animal cruelty and the First Amendment

Published by Linda Watkins under Legal

Since the U.S. Supreme Court ruling on Tuesday in the case of United States v. Stevens, I’m guessing that practically every animal advocacy group in the country has posted articles with some version of the headline: Supreme Court Rules Overturns Anti-Animal Cruelty Law.

Unfortunately while the various iterations of this headline do make a person stop and read the article, the fact is the Supreme Court did no such thing. They did say that the current law which says that anyone who: “creates, sells or possesses a depiction of animal cruelty” for commercial gain can be imprisoned for up to five years. A depiction of cruelty was defined as one in which “a living animal is intentionally maimed, mutilated, tortured, wounded or killed,” is too broadly written. Continue Reading »

No responses yet

Mar 30 2010

Downsizing

Published by Linda Watkins under Relinquishing a dog

For the last 6 years we’ve been a three-dog household. It wasn’t quite intentional: first there was Rose; a couple of months later Shae joined us, and two years later Sam came along.

About four months after Shae came to live with us, I knew it was going to be difficult, but I always believed we could make it work. Rose and Shae did not like each other. It wasn’t even a matter of a couple of jealous females, they quite simply have very different personalities that are continually in conflict.

When, at the age of six months, Rose ripped open two-year-old Shae’s side because she was pushing her way through the door ahead of Rose, it was apparent that “difficult” was a mild description of their relationship. Rose is a very typical opinionated, bossy, “I’m in charge” cattle dog. Shae is a typical soft, people pleaser border collie; the two personalities just did not mesh and we’ve spent the last nine years trying to keep Shae in one piece. Continue Reading »

No responses yet

Mar 04 2010

Best Laid Plans, part 2

Published by Linda Watkins under Fostering rescues

A little update on Pearl — she made it through her surgery just fine. In total there were four puppies: two stillborn, one still in her but dead, and a little skeleton – all that remained of the puppy that was being reabsorbed.

I delivered Pearl yesterday to her foster home along with a bag full of medications. Checked up on her last night and she was voluntarily coming out of her crate — a huge step for this very shy, submissive little dog! — and the BIG news: she was laying on the floor next to folks in the house and soliciting pets; nudging people with her nose when they stopped petting her.

There’s definitely hope for this sweet dog and it’s good to know that we were able to give her a chance at a better life.

No responses yet

Mar 02 2010

The Best Laid Plans

Published by Linda Watkins under Fostering rescues

Today I had my day well planned — I would walk my dogs for an hour or so in the morning, then pack up my computer and head out to the library to work on the final pages of One Dog at a Time, a book I am writing about the who, how, and why of rescue.

Instead at 8:30 the call came from on of my foster moms: Last night one of the Burns dogs delivered a stillborn puppy. We’d been told when we got her that she “might” be pregnant, but after three months there had been no indicators — no shape/weight change, no milk coming in….nothing. She’d been to the vet for check over & vaccinations & they’d not seen or felt any indicator of pregnancy, so the puppy was definitely a shock. Continue Reading »

No responses yet

Feb 23 2010

Happy Birthday Rose

Published by Linda Watkins under Navel gazing

In February 2001 I found an ad in the paper for McNab puppies ready for new homes. I called my friendly animal communicator hoping that she’d tell me my current dog, Sarah, really didn’t want a new puppy in the house. Much to my chagrin, instead I was told that Sarah wanted me to quit fostering, but that she wouldn’t mind a puppy. Of course she thought I was going to get one of the McNabs or a border collie — which were my first choice.

But the McNabs were snapped up and a friend’s dog the next day had a litter of Australian cattle dogs. I’d been around heelers before, enjoyed them, but never actually lived with or trained one but I figured that having spent 20 years with border collies, how hard could it be?

Nine years later I’m still reeling from the shock. I should have known better than to name a cattle dog “Rose Lassen” — it was purely an emotional decision and I completely ignored the possibility of Karma being involved. “Rose” was the name of a dear friend; an older, very independent, stubborn, opinionated woman who I used to spend ranching summers with. “Lassen” is a volcano in Northern California — I grew up in its shadow and the name was in honor of my dad who died a couple of weeks before Rose came to live with me. Rose has fulfilled the promise of both names.

I really didn’t know anything about the personality of Australian Cattle Dogs and I had a steep learning curve awaiting. Thank goodness I found sites such as www.cattledog.com and www.aucado.us to help with ideas, suggestions, and general sanity savers.

Life with Rose has not been dull, but for the most part it’s been interesting (like the curse: May you live in interesting times….). Life would be easier if Rose was the only dog — I think we’d all have a lot more fun and she would not feel the need to keep everyone else in line. Rose is definitely a working dog and she’d have been much happier living somewhere that she could keep busy. I tried: I waited too long to introduce her to livestock, so herding wasn’t much of an option — she had no interest in getting near “those animals”; she enjoyed agility….up to a point. Just playing on the dog walk & tunnels was good, but she really doesn’t like the A-frame and jumps and has no interest in any type of competition. We tried once. Basically, every time we enter an agility arena and there’s any hint of competition going on, she pees in one corner, poops in another & comes back to me with her ears up, little stump of a tail wiggling & waits to leave the area.

Rose is my Devil Dog — she will make sure order is always restored, and she’s also expert at getting everyone riled up. There are days when I look at her and wonder what the heck I did. And there are days when I laugh as I watch her working out new situations, deciding who she needs to snark into line, trying to get comfortable for a nap, or cruising the aisles of the pet stores. One thing I know, I never look at her without smiling, even when she’s doing something I’d really prefer she not do.

Last year about this time I thought we were going to lose her; Rose developed a skin condition that was causing her hair to fall off, her feet and legs were crusted and oozing blood, and nothing the vet tried seemed to be helping. The vet initially thought it was a food allergy, but after a month of meds and hypoallergenic food, things seemed to be getting worse. I was facing euthanizing her because there was no way I would allow her to live in such misery and there didn’t seem to be an answer. Finally, after three skin scrapings over the course of several weeks, we determined that she had demodex and once we knew what it was, it was a matter of weeks before we had her cleared up. But each day I check her over carefully for any sign of a recurrence.

Facing the loss brought me to the realization of just how much I love Rose and how much joy she brings me — even at the times I’m trying to get her to behave. She has so much joy and mischief built into her personality. When her eyes sparkle and her ears go up & her little tail stump sticks up… well, it’s hard not to laugh. Rosie isn’t a perfect dog by any means: she has a bark that’ll pierce your eardrums; at 9 she still acts like a 2-year-old; she’s domineering; she’d prefer no other dogs lived in her house; she thinks the bed and the couch belong to her and doesn’t hesitate to push you out of the way of her comfort. She’d prefer her life revolved around lounging and eating bon-bons — preferably beef-flavored; she hates going outside to potty in the rain; she’s chewed holes in most of my fleece clothing that she’s gotten ahold of as well as couch throws, crate blankets, and bath towels (but never shoes!). She’ll sneak food off of a table if it’s at her mouth level; she has no consciense; but she does know when I’m upset and does her best at such times to make me smile.

On the other hand, Rose has a sense of humor and mischief that won’t quit; she can be affectionate; she’s a velcro dog who I never have to worry about running away — teasing me to catch her – yes – running away – no; and if one of the other dogs has any kind of an accident in the house or car, Rose hurries to let me know either by just running back & forth or in the car, barking until I pull over and clean up whatever it is that she disapproves of.

Happy Birthday Rosie — I hope you remain strong and healthy for many, many more.

No responses yet

Feb 11 2010

Activism 101

Published by Linda Watkins under Legal

I wrote this article in 2009 for the Belgian Shepherd quarterly.  Thought it wouldn’t hurt to post it again this year.

This year’s spate of dog related state legislation has prompted many dog owners to become involved in politics at a level they never imagined.  Most often legal action regarding canines involves local city or county ordinances, and concerns license fees, numbers of dogs a pet owner is allowed to have in their home, or barking dog ordinances.

Instead, this year on state levels we’ve seen proposed “puppy mill” legislation geared toward limiting the numbers of breedable dogs a person may own, and regulating how the dogs are maintained; laws requiring owners of certain dog breeds to carry liability insurance on their dog; breed specific legislation proposing to ban certain dog breeds from a state; mandatory spay/neuter proposals; and a proposed tax on dog food to fund statewide spay/neuter programs.

In addition there have been the usual efforts to clean up old, outdated codes – Washington state did one of these in a rather awkward approach that generated a great deal of consternation among dog owners until it was clarified. Continue Reading »

No responses yet

Feb 11 2010

Note to Adopters w/ thanks to Diane Morgan

Published by Linda Watkins under Adopting

NOTE TO ADOPTERS
[by Diane Morgan]

Diane writes, “After a couple of bad experiences with adopters (NOT the dog) in rescue lately — I wrote this. Forgive the irritated tone. (If anyone would like to place this on their own rescue page for any breed, you have my permission so long as the content is not altered.” dcrocodile@aol.com)

Note to adopters: Lassie and Cleo and Rin Tin Tin and Toto don’t show up in rescue. We don’t get the elegantly coiffed, classically beautiful, completely trained, perfectly behaved dog. We get the leftovers. Dogs that other people have incompetently bred, inadequately socialized, ineffectively “trained,” and badly treated.

Most Rescue dogs have had it. They’ve been pushed from one lousy situation to another. They’ve never had proper veterinary care, kind and consistent training, or sufficient company. They’ve lived outside, in a crate, or in the basement. They’re scared, depressed and anxious. Some are angry. Some are sick. Some have given up.

But we are Rescue and we don’t give up. We never give up on a dog. We know that a dog is a living being, with a spirit and a heart and feelings. Our dogs are not commodities, things, or garbage. They are part of sacred creation and they deserve as much love and care and respect as the next Westminster champion.

So please, please don’t come to rescue in the hopes of getting a “bargain,” or indeed of “getting” anything. Come to Rescue to give, to love, to save a life — and to mend your own spirit. For Rescue will reward you in ways you never thought possible. I can promise you this — a rescue dog will make you a better person.

No responses yet

Dec 25 2009

The Burns/Harney County Hoarding Case

Published by Linda Watkins under Legal

I’ve spent most of the last three days working on this project — ironic as I’d planned to do no more than help with a little networking and “let someone else take the dogs.” But such is the nature of rescue that instead I’ve been helping Harney County Save a Stray with networking contacts; spent most of one day drafting a press release and researching and gathering the names and contact addresses for the relevant newspapers and television stations; and even found some foster spaces for some of the dogs. What else could I do?

Melanie was single handedly trying to find placements for over 60 dogs — and the frustrating part was that most people thought everything was already taken care of so we were having a hard time finding the help. The problem stemmed from the great news coverage the Oregon Humane Society got when they pulled over 80 of the dogs when the case first broke. We’re all grateful that OHS took so many dogs, but unfortunately in the course of publicizing their work, the impression was left with the public that all of the dogs were taken care of. Instead there are scores of dogs still at the site and if we can’t get them moved soon, they will probably be shot.

Rather than transferring dogs from one crate to another, we loaded the whole crate into the receiving organizations' vans.

Rather than transferring dogs from one crate to another, we loaded the whole crate into the receiving organizations' vans.

Continue Reading »

5 responses so far

Dec 10 2009

Fighting the legal system

Published by Linda Watkins under Legal

And then we wonder why people who abuse animals are not more severely prosecuted:

Jefferson County Commissioners Tad Hegsted, Chairman: rthegsted@hotmail.com; Ron Baxter: tirefactory2002@yahoo.com ; Debbie Karren dkarren@co.jefferson.id.us; Blair Olsen, Sheriff; 200 Courthouse Way; Rigby, ID 83442; (208)745-9210

And then there’s Snohomish County, WA:
We just lost our appeal in 9th Circuit Court. We had been fighting Snohomish County
for the last 5 years over their ruling that animal shelters/rescues cannot keep any animal
for more than 6 months. We just lost. I don’t know what some of the groups are going to
do that have many animals that are sick, old, feral, FIV, just don’t adopt out, etc. It is
very wrong for a County to say you have to euthanize those animals. It is very wrong for
a federal court to uphold this.

Some other points for Snohomish County – all foster homes must be licensed. Commercial
kennels acting as Rescues cannot have foster homes and cannot sell or adopt out animal
unless they give them away. The bottom line here is that Snohomish County doesn’t want
any Rescues. I notice in the Herald this week it said that the Everett Animal Shelter found
homes for 2,500 last year and took in 7,500. What happened to the 5,000 that didn’t find
homes, and now Rescues are being told to stop rescuing anything unless it is adoptable.
Snohomish County in its ultimate wisdom declines to run its own animals shelter yet
seemingly knows everything about running one yet 5,000 are not adopted at just one of
their contract shelters. I don’t know PAWS figures who are Snohomish County’s other
contractor.

If anyone would be interested in joining a group to continue fighting this, please email
us at hmnsoc@aol.com This group would also include people with building/planning
issues and land development issues. This is because one is more likely to be heard
if you have numbers. Currently we have about 3,000 followers but always need more
as a lot of them are not Snohomish County residents, just supporters.

How sad for the animals. What is our country coming to. Please feel free to
cross-post. The more support we can get the better.

Board of Directors
Humane Society, Arlington, WA.

No responses yet

Dec 10 2009

The Cost of Hoarding

Published by Linda Watkins under Legal

In the last year it seems that not a month has gone by without news of the seizure of a triple-digit number of dogs somewhere in the U.S.  Numbers range from a mere 100 (most of which are pregnant females), to five or six hundred (most of which are pregnant females).  Rarely are any of these critters spayed or neutered, most are disease-ridden, severely underweight, and poorly socialized — that is to say, they are used to other dogs, but not real comfortable with humans other than knowing they may sporadically get food from them.

What I’m also noticing is the increasing frequency with which these seizures are accompanied by child welfare complaints.  We seem to keep ignoring that animal abuse and neglect are closely linked to child abuse and neglect — most family law judges and attorneys acknowledge this link; it’s been proven time and again in academic and clinical studies, and yet as a matter of practice our law makers persist in their passive denial of the link between the two behaviors. Continue Reading »

One response so far

Next »